Sunrise through screen window
~~~~~
Jeff Korentayer DMH
www.arcanum.ca
www.twitter.com/jkorentayer
~~~~~
Jeff Korentayer DMH
www.arcanum.ca
www.twitter.com/jkorentayer
I wonder how long it will be before a printed book becomes a rarity? JMK
Latest Victim of the Internet: The Oxford English Dictionary | Fast Company
http://origin-www.fastcompany.com/1685794/latest-victim-of-the-internet-the-oxford-english-dictionary
BY Dan NosowitzMon Aug 30, 2010
The Oxford English Dictionary, currently a 20 volume, 750-pound monstrosity, has been the authoritive word on the words of the English language for 126 years. The OED3, the first new edition since 1989, may also be the first to forgo print entirely, reports the AP.
The Internet is on a physical-media-killing rampage. First BlockBuster, now the venerable OED?
Nigel Portwood, chief executive of the Oxford University Press (isn’t that the perfect name for him?), says online revenue has been so high that it is highly unlikely that the third edition of the OED will be physically printed. The full 20-volume set costs $995 at Amazon, and of course it requires supplementals regularly to account for valuable words like “bootylicious.”
In contrast, the online version, while still (in my mind) very pricey at $295 per year, is successful enough to score about two million hits per year. Nearly $300 per year for a subscription to a dictionary may seem outlandish, but the OED is more than Dictionary.com, with detailed lexographic histories of words that outstrip any other source.
Oxford University Press’s team of lexicographers, 80-strong, is working hard on the OED3, a massive, decade-long task. In fact, the OED3 is only about 25% finished, and nobody seems clear on when it might be ready for release.
In any case, the physical publication of the OED3 depends on demand—if the publisher sees adequate demand, they’ll do a limited printing. If not, the OED will go online-only.
Dan Nosowitz, the author of this post, can be followed on Twitter, corresponded with via email, and stalked in Brooklyn (no link for that one—you’ll have to do the legwork yourself).
(via Instapaper)
~~~~~
Jeff Korentayer DMH
www.arcanum.ca
www.twitter.com/jkorentayer
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
~~~~~
Jeff Korentayer DMH
www.arcanum.ca
www.twitter.com/jkorentayer
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
“Conspiracy Theory” or “Conspiracy Fact”?
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
~~~~~
Jeff Korentayer DMH
www.arcanum.ca
www.twitter.com/jkorentayer
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web
Government, public health and dairy industry officials want to restrict the sale and distribution of raw milk, citing safety concerns. But small dairy farmers, organic consumers’ advocates and raw milk drinkers say that safety isn’t the real issue — it’s control of the dairy market.
In January, the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) proposed new regulations that would ban off-the-farm sale and distribution of raw milk. Prior to making the regulations public, MDAR issued cease-and-desist orders to four milk-buying clubs.
While no one has died in Massachusetts because of raw milk, three people died in 2007 from Listeriosis from pasteurized milk.
According to In These Times:
“Considering the relative safety of raw milk and its possible health benefits, campaigns against its legalization are surprisingly intense, and not just in Massachusetts.”
David Gumpert, author of The Raw Milk Revolution, argues that regulation is “not about safety — it’s about protecting markets.”
Posted via email from Jeff’s assorted wanderings through the world and the web